us
Find content
Male
#97633 PS4 VS Xbox one
Posted
on 15 June 2013 - 02:13 PM
#97603 PS4 VS Xbox one
Posted
on 14 June 2013 - 02:55 PM
It's time for the real dilema:
#97528 WWDC 2013 & E3 2013
Posted
on 11 June 2013 - 06:31 PM
Sony released an instructional video explaining how the game-sharing feature of the PS4 works.
https://www.youtube....h?v=kWSIFh8ICaA
#97492 WWDC 2013 & E3 2013
Posted
on 10 June 2013 - 06:14 PM
OS X Mavericks... weird name.. but they did list OpenGL 4
#97243 How does your computer/workspace look like?
Posted
on 01 June 2013 - 07:36 AM
Not an impersonator :D, on 01 June 2013 - 06:24 AM, said:
Heres my setup
Spoiler
Sure
http://www.mmo-champ...=1#post20511920
#97161 Personality Fit Game
Posted
on 29 May 2013 - 11:24 AM
#97152 skyrim mac lag
Posted
on 28 May 2013 - 09:53 PM
The fact that the 9400M is too slow to run this at acceptable speeds is probably the reason. You cannot expect a lag free experience on that GPU.
#97065 Some Port Help?
Posted
on 24 May 2013 - 01:05 AM
#96375 Is my computer to outdated??
Posted
on 29 April 2013 - 11:23 PM
Quote
Is my computer to outdated??
yes
#96320 Can you Port an Xbox 360 game onto Mac?
Posted
on 27 April 2013 - 10:04 AM
hmtinc, on 27 April 2013 - 03:38 AM, said:
Well technically if you were the developer it would be possible because they have access to the source code and they can make a mac/pc port out of the source code.
But for us users the only way we are ever going to get to run these console exclusives on pc/mac is through emulators . But sadly pc hardware isn't powerful enough to emulate the consoles yet , so the answer to your question would be NO .
But for us users the only way we are ever going to get to run these console exclusives on pc/mac is through emulators . But sadly pc hardware isn't powerful enough to emulate the consoles yet , so the answer to your question would be NO .
#95703 GeForce GTX 680 Mac Edition
Posted
on 05 April 2013 - 08:21 PM
hmtinc, on 05 April 2013 - 08:08 PM, said:
This is great and all , till you look at the price 
at $599 the gtx 680 mac edition is $120 more then the pc equivalent of the card : http://www.newegg.ca...N82E16814130768
Wouldn't it be cheaper to just buy a pc version of the card and install it , from what i remember its possible to get a pc version of the card running on a mac pro with a few simple hacks .
at $599 the gtx 680 mac edition is $120 more then the pc equivalent of the card : http://www.newegg.ca...N82E16814130768Wouldn't it be cheaper to just buy a pc version of the card and install it , from what i remember its possible to get a pc version of the card running on a mac pro with a few simple hacks .
You could, but you won't get boot screen f.ex.
Mac Pro owners have earlier only had the option to either use a hacked card, or officially either a GTX285 or a Quadro card (which costs like $1500 and upwards).
Now they can get a new compatible card for like a third of the cost of a Quadro.
Here is a "worst case scenario" for AMD/ATi users for pro use:
You will actually use a full work day (436 minutes= 7 hours and 16 minutes) to render something on an AMD card that you could do in minutes on a NVidia card
I guess if you live on using After Effects, you can afford the $100 premium for a mac branded version
#94712 Tomb Raider
Posted
on 08 March 2013 - 09:44 PM
lisapower, on 08 March 2013 - 09:39 PM, said:
How many Log's should i post, till i get some help? i already posted 3 or 4.
Almost everyone seems to be having the same issue. The guys over at WineHQ are trying to figure out whats causing this bug. Give it time.
#94544 I AM LEAVING PORTINGTEAM
Posted
on 04 March 2013 - 10:49 AM
ok..
Happened to me, twice.
First megaupload shut down, and I had all my ports there.
Then mediafire did delete my files, for some unknown reason.
I lost some ports each time, but the popular ones is never hard to get a hold of again.
But, I don't give up that easy.
Happened to me, twice.
First megaupload shut down, and I had all my ports there.
Then mediafire did delete my files, for some unknown reason.
I lost some ports each time, but the popular ones is never hard to get a hold of again.
But, I don't give up that easy.
#94537 Why wrappers over wine?
Posted
on 04 March 2013 - 02:22 AM
THe thing that always ticked me off about Wine and Crossover, was updating to a new version, and breaking several programs that used to work... one reason I wanted to have self contained apps that worked and didn't get broken by just trying ot get some other program working.
#94523 Why wrappers over wine?
Posted
on 02 March 2013 - 11:09 PM
Speed will be the same.
Pros with normal wine is that it will take less space.
Cons is that you won't get a self-contained app, you won't have a GUI.
You will also need to make different prefixes for each app that need a different configuration.
Also you are using wine, and you are a part of the thriving wine community.
Wineskin is just a tool that puts wine into a GUI with it's own x server, you are using the same wine.
Pros with normal wine is that it will take less space.
Cons is that you won't get a self-contained app, you won't have a GUI.
You will also need to make different prefixes for each app that need a different configuration.
Also you are using wine, and you are a part of the thriving wine community.
Wineskin is just a tool that puts wine into a GUI with it's own x server, you are using the same wine.
